07
Mar
Nikon 80 400 Vs 70 200. Anytime you are photographing a distant object then atmospheric conditions come into play with any lens. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F45-56G ED VR. The 80-400 VR or the 70-200 VR plus a teleconverter. Also though I am resigned to having to pay in the range of 1500 to 2000 or a tad more for this the superb 4000-6000 lenses eg.
10282020 Nikon 80-400mm AF-S VR vs Nikon 70-200mm f28G VR II TC-20E III I know that many of our readers will ask me to compare the Nikon 80-400mm AF-S to the Nikon 70-200mm f28G VR II TC-20E III. 6262005 The 80-400 af-s is better all round than a 70-200 2x converterbut you do have more flexibility with the latter re with or without converters and as a stand alone mid zoom its fantastic for events etc. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F28G ED VR II. The 70-200 would focus much faster than the 80-200. The 200-500 then extends the focal length into exotic territory for when the 70-200 isnt long enough. More to come in the upcoming Nikon 80-400mm f45-56G VR review so stay tuned.
3302013 Nikon AF-S 80-400mm F45-56G VR Nikon AF-S 300mm F4 ED note the 300PF is the new version but did not exist at the time of the review Nikon 70-200mm F28 VRII Nikon TC14EII note this has since been replaced with the TC14 EIII.
More to come in the upcoming Nikon 80-400mm f45-56G VR review so stay tuned. The 200-500 is much cheaper than the 80-400 and is probably the best value for a long lens. The 80-400 VR or the 70-200 VR plus a teleconverter. 6302016 The close range. Other options I have not mentioned here that might work as well or better than these options. The previous 80-400 is better than the 70-200 with 2X right in the center but outside the center the 70-200 with TC is very close.