20
Feb
Nikon 55 200 Vs 70 300. Save your pennies if you have to until you can purchase this. 1162018 The newer 55-200 VR2 makes a cheap easy to stow lens. The 70-300 non VR for the price performs exceedingly well. 322010 The 70-300 is somewhat larger and heavier than the 55-200 but its a very solid lens and it has a metal mounting plate to the camera - the 55-200 is all plastic construction so isnt as robust and also the handling is not as good as the larger lens.
May not exactly fit in a coat pocket. 7202010 the 70-300 is a far better option than either the nikon 55-200 or the sigma variant for what you want to do. 972011 The 70-300 is a far superior lens in terms of build qualitythe 55-300 being the same kit lens quality as the 55-200. The second lens in this Sigma 18 250 vs Nikon 18 200 vs Nikon 70 300 vs Nikon 55 300 Comparison. This Nikon lens. 55-200 AF-S VR 150 retail.
Sigma 70-300mm F4-56 DG Macro.
However stopped down to f8 both lenses produced similar results in the center and the mid-frame while the cheaper 70-300mm showed better corner performance. Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect the vibrations of the camera. Get Instant Quality Info at iZito Now. Thx in advanceI researched and found both are DX format lensAlso 70-300 is cheaperIf 70-300 has better faster AF then definitely this is it as it is also cheaper. 322010 The 70-300 is somewhat larger and heavier than the 55-200 but its a very solid lens and it has a metal mounting plate to the camera - the 55-200 is all plastic construction so isnt as robust and also the handling is not as good as the larger lens. They are exactly the same price at least on Amazon.